March 2019 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Mar 4 20:01:47 UTC 2019
Ending: Thu Mar 28 14:01:00 UTC 2019
Messages: 117

• [License-discuss] February 2019 Summary   Lukas Atkinson
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Pamela Chestek
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Pamela Chestek
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   John Cowan
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   John Cowan
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   John Cowan
• [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law?   John Cowan
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Andrew DeMarsh
• [License-discuss] moderator information outdated   Andrew DeMarsh
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Michael Downey
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Kevin P. Fleming
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement?   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Brendan Hickey
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Ben Hilburn
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Ben Hilburn
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Ben Hilburn
• [License-discuss] discussion of tools   Ben Hilburn
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Chris Jerdonek
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Chris Jerdonek
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Chris Jerdonek
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Chris Jerdonek
• [License-discuss] Fw: #905674: parallel: move to nonfree   Chris Lamb
• [License-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fw: #905674: parallel: move to nonfree   Chris Lamb
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Mike Milinkovich
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] Discourse hosting   Rick Moen
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] Fwd: Re: Fw: #905674: parallel: move to nonfree   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law?   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Bruce Perens
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] moderator information outdated   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] Why GPLv3 does not have a indemnification clause by default?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] Doese GPLv3 allow misrepresentation and grant rights under trademark law?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] The GPL Meets the UCC: Does Free Software Come with a Warranty of No Infringement of Patents and Copyrights?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] Are limitation/disclaimer of warranty clauses legally non-binding due to missing browsewrap/clickwrap agreement?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding?   Patrick Schleizer
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Smith, McCoy
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Smith, McCoy
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   John Sullivan
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   John Sullivan
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] The per se license constructor   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   VanL
• [License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License   VanL
• [License-discuss] GPL developer protections: Is limitation/disclaimer of warranty legally non-binding?   VanL
• [License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] Fwd: discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] The pro se license constructor   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy   Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Florian Weimer
• [License-discuss] Intimacy in open source (SSPL and AGPL)   Florian Weimer
• [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)   Florian Weimer

Last message date: Thu Mar 28 14:01:00 UTC 2019
Archived on: Sun Apr 14 11:45:11 UTC 2019

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...