[License-discuss] The political / technical dichotomy

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Thu Mar 21 01:16:54 UTC 2019


I think that this would introduce a constant source of tension and more
argument. And I hear we have enough of that :-)
I sympathize with Luis' unease in this case.



On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:39 PM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>

> I was thinking that the public nature of the document would keep the
> recordkeeper honest. (Although I suppose that then spawns a second
> generation dispute about whether the document is accurate.) But the
> person with primary responsibility for its currency and completeness
> doesn't have to have final authority on its accuracy. That lesser burden
> could reside in a volunteer third party or board member.
> Mostly I was just trying to figure out how to avoid putting more work on
> volunteers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190320/dce6eca2/attachment.html>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list