[License-discuss] discussion of L-R process [was Re: [License-review] Approval: Server Side Public License, Version 2 (SSPL v2)]
bruce at perens.com
Fri Mar 15 21:27:11 UTC 2019
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 2:21 PM Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> If the
> main problem is 'Sometimes, net.random participants on OSI mailing lists
> are misunderstood to be somehow reflecting the position of OSI', then
> perhaps the appropriate remedy is a stronger social convention for
> official OSI representatives to always identify themselves as such and
> state when they are speaking officially.
You're asking the people who are charged with voting to make a decision to
also state the *official *position of the organization. Pick one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss