[License-discuss] For Public Comment: The Cryptographic Autonomy License

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Sun Mar 17 00:39:47 UTC 2019

>  *First, would you please discuss whether there is a sufficient public
performance right for software defined in 17 USC 106 (4), (5) and (6)? I
read your discussion of Public Performance and was not enlightened.*

The problem I'm having with this is that you tossed out "software is
defined as a literary work" without explanation. Where? By Nimmer, or the
Supreme Court? With existing case law of the use of public performance
rights for software?



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190316/2b405f04/attachment.html>

More information about the License-discuss mailing list