March 2012 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Mar 2 06:21:04 UTC 2012
Ending: Fri Mar 23 20:02:30 UTC 2012
Messages: 120

• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Karl Fogel
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Bruce Perens
    • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Karl Fogel
    • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Henrik Ingo
    • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chuck Swiger
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   John Cowan
      • [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Jim Jagielski
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents   Thorsten Glaser
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Jim Jagielski
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Josh Berkus
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] Patents and the OSD   Jim Jagielski
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
      • [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   John Cowan
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Joel Sherrill
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chuck Swiger
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Richard Fontana
    • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chris DiBona
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Mark Wielaard
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Gervase Markham
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Tzeng, Nigel H.
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Clark C. Evans
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Thorsten Glaser
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Lawrence Rosen
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Josh Berkus
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chad Perrin
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Wilson, Andrew
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Alexander Terekhov
    • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Carl Boettiger
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chris Zumbrunn
  • [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Brendan Scott
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
  • [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
    • [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Carlo Piana
      • [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
      • [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Karl Fogel
  • [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Patrick Moreau
  • [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Basile Starynkevitch
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Xue, Yuan
  • [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   John Cowan
  • [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Jim Jagielski
    • [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Xue, Yuan
      • [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Karl Fogel

Last message date: Fri Mar 23 20:02:30 UTC 2012
Archived on: Wed Dec 6 21:03:09 UTC 2017

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...