March 2012 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Mar 2 06:21:04 UTC 2012
Ending: Fri Mar 23 20:02:30 UTC 2012
Messages: 120

• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Josh Berkus
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Josh Berkus
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Josh Berkus
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Carl Boettiger
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   John Cowan
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   John Cowan
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   John Cowan
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   John Cowan
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chris DiBona
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Clark C. Evans
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Karl Fogel
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Richard Fontana
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Thorsten Glaser
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Henrik Ingo
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Jim Jagielski
• [License-review] Patents and the OSD   Jim Jagielski
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Jim Jagielski
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Jim Jagielski
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Gervase Markham
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Rick Moen
• [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Patrick Moreau
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Russ Nelson
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Bruce Perens
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chad Perrin
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
• [License-review] avoid gray areas?   Chad Perrin
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Carlo Piana
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Lawrence Rosen
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Brendan Scott
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Joel Sherrill
• [License-review] CeCILL license V2.1 for Approval   Basile Starynkevitch
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chuck Swiger
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chuck Swiger
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
• [License-review] MXM compared to CC0   Chuck Swiger
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] First Sale in Europe (upcoming preliminary ruling)   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Alexander Terekhov
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]   Tzeng, Nigel H.
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Mark Wielaard
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Wilson, Andrew
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Xue, Yuan
• [License-review] iSEEEULA-1.0 for Approval   Xue, Yuan
• [License-review] Non-binding straw poll: Do you think CC0 should be approved?   Chris Zumbrunn

Last message date: Fri Mar 23 20:02:30 UTC 2012
Archived on: Wed Dec 6 21:03:09 UTC 2017

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...