[License-review] [License-discuss] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]

[Alexander Terekhov]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov dixit:
>
>>> ND isn’t Open Source, though.
>>
>>Please explain in details what do you mean by proclaiming that "ND
>>isn’t Open Source",
>
> Oh sorry. No Derivatives. The text you cited was clear on applying
> only to unmodified works.

Do you really think that similar text would not apply if the dedicator
would release a right to prepare derivates to the public domain as
well?