[License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Fri Mar 9 16:55:05 UTC 2012
Karl Fogel scripsit:
> >If you want an organization that recommends licenses, the FSF is happy
> >to help. I agree that OSI should have a short-list of recommended
> >licenses, but the politics of dis-recommending some organization's
> >license are too much for them.
> This isn't actually the case, by the way. It's not the politics; it's
> more the time it takes to do it right.
I sat on the committee that came up with OSI's current classifications.
Its original remit was to evaluate licenses into best/okay/bad, but no
one except me was willing to actually say that a license was bad or that
people shouldn't use it, so we wound up with the existing, basically
fact-based classification scheme. And we took plenty of time just to
get to that, so it wasn't a matter of time.
I believe I was the only non-lawyer on that committee, except for ESR
who wasn't able to attend most of the meetings.
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell, John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry. If you are absolutely cowan at ccil.org
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be
on the Cross Bronx Expressway. --Alan Feuer, NYTimes, 2002-09-20
More information about the License-review