[License-review] CC0 incompliant with OSD on patents, [was: MXM compared to CC0 ]

[Karl Fogel]

Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> writes:
>I don't think there is the slightest danger of this happening. The
>only person suggesting this has some sort of bee in his bonnet
>regarding me personally. However, I do think that OSI should be more
>cognizant of patent issues in the approval process going forward.

...a sentiment others here have expressed too (e.g., Chris DiBona).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120306/ce05f791/attachment.sig>