Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL

John Cowan jcowan at reutershealth.com
Wed Mar 12 21:04:16 UTC 2003


Alex Russell scripsit:

> So long as your license terms do not contradict the license you received the
> original work under (the AFL), this is my understanding of the situation.

Well, "contradict" is fuzzy.  It can be licensed under terms that are
completely different from the AFL's: for example, it can be issued under a
proprietary license.

-- 
Winter:  MIT,                                   John Cowan
Keio, INRIA,                                    jcowan at reutershealth.com
Issue lots of Drafts.                           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand!                     http://www.reutershealth.com
Might simplicity return?                        (A "tanka", or extended haiku)
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



More information about the License-discuss mailing list