Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL

[Alex Russell]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 March 2003 02:46 pm, Andy Tai wrote:
> So the "AFL" no longer applies to the derived work, is
> that what you are saying?
>
> So I can do whatever I want with my derived work, from
> a "AFL" work, licensing my derived work in any terms I
> want, and people using the derived work will not be
> bound by conditions of the "AFL" but by my terms only?

So long as your license terms do not contradict the license you received the 
original work under (the AFL), this is my understanding of the situation.

- -- 
Alex Russell
alex at netWindows.org
alex at SecurePipe.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+b59ioV0dQ6uSmkYRAvnfAJ9oK9zDLzYEb+sD/oHGtQefToQ/rwCg3uPs
jEydBncF0oDrwSRXO39Ezv0=
=m0QE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3