[License-review] New License for Consideration - Public Benefit Zero Copyright License v. 2.0

[McCoy Smith]

The problem is that public domain is a concept that exists as part of 
international copyright law, and in fact predates it. You can't just 
rewrite in a way you like.

On 12/18/2024 12:03 PM, Wayne Thornton wrote:
>
> I realize my last email may have come off as glib or argumentative, 
> and for that I apologize. My intention in that statement was to simply 
> say that I believe there is no reason a new type of license or 
> paradigm cannot be created. The first step is the creation itself, 
> then adoption.
>
> *From:*License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> 
> *On Behalf Of *Wayne Thornton
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:52 PM
> *To:* License submissions for OSI review 
> <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [License-review] New License for Consideration - Public 
> Benefit Zero Copyright License v. 2.0
>
> There was no such thing as copyleft either, before the GPL. Doesn’t 
> make it impossible for a new type of license to be created.
>
> *From:*License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> 
> *On Behalf Of *McCoy Smith
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:48 PM
> *To:* License submissions for OSI review 
> <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [License-review] New License for Consideration - Public 
> Benefit Zero Copyright License v. 2.0
>
> The problem is that if it is public domain it must be unrestricted. 
> There is no such thing as public domain but with restrictions
>
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:*License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> on 
> behalf of Wayne Thornton <wmthornton-dev at outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 11:24:54 AM
> *To:* License submissions for OSI review 
> <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [License-review] New License for Consideration - Public 
> Benefit Zero Copyright License v. 2.0
>
> Perhaps the term “license” doesn’t apply and that particular line of 
> argument wasn’t well drafted on my part, but that doesn’t change the 
> rest of the argument that  “the intention of the license is to 
> dedicate works to the public domain /for a particular purpose/ aka to 
> benefit the general public by sharing technological innovations and 
> ideas in the form of source code, binaries and documentation of same. 
> “ (previous email)
>
> *From:*License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> 
> *On Behalf Of *Kevin P. Fleming
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2024 12:11 PM
> *To:* license-review at lists.opensource.org
> *Subject:* Re: [License-review] New License for Consideration - Public 
> Benefit Zero Copyright License v. 2.0
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024, at 10:59, Wayne Thornton wrote:
>
>     That being said,  at their core, a license like the GPL and the
>     proposed PBZC are simply grants of rights to use the source code
>     in other projects.
>
> That is certainly true of the GPL family of licenses, but it is not 
> true of the 'public domain dedication' portion of the PBZC. That 
> dedication is an explicit relinquishment of the copyrights the author 
> has in the work. Once those rights have been relinquished, the author 
> cannot use the rights to take any action against anyone making use of 
> the work, no matter what that use may be. A public domain dedication 
> is not a license.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20241218/14d5694f/attachment.htm>