[License-review] License-review Digest, Vol 95, Issue 6
implementnap at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 14:47:35 UTC 2020
I thought about your comment on the fraud section. I don't think we need
license termination for that section. What if the section merely read:
No Licensable IP or Restricted work may be used to commit fraud
Would that change address your concern regarding "No Discrimination against
fields of endeavor"?
Also, thank you for taking the time to review the license. If we can
perfect it and get it approved, I plan to use it in my company and
encourage others to do so as well. Overall, I think the license has reached
a stable point in terms of intent. However, I suspect there are sections
where the wording can be improved. So, I'm happy to work with any
constructive feedback you might have. In reference to one comment, I
received recently here is one question I have: Here are my current
Is there any substantial difference between:
a) "Licensable IP" means all IP the owners of the included work can or
will be able to license.
b) "Licensable IP" means all IP the owners of the included work can or
will be able to license that would otherwise infringe that owner's IP
If so, which definition is better?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-review