[License-review] Anti-IP License
mccoy at lexpan.law
Fri Oct 16 14:04:13 UTC 2020
This is an interesting concept, but poorly executed. Kevin points out one
problem. Another is that it doesn't anywhere discuss source code (which
would seem to violate OSD 2).
I'd say this is one that really needs a lawyer's involvement, to ensure its
terms meet the goals of the author and also satisfy the OSD.
FWIW, I'm not sure how this would be found "unconscionable" at least under
USA law; it appears to be something like an attempt to do a copyleft public
domain dedication, which AFAIK, isn't unconscionable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-review <license-review-bounces at lists.opensource.org> On
> Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming
> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 6:29 AM
> To: License submissions for OSI review
<license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> Subject: Re: [License-review] Anti-IP License
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 8:18 AM Alex Williams <implementnap at gmail.com>
> > No Fraud
> > No Licensable IP or Restricted work may be used to commit fraud. If you
> found guilty of committing fraud using any of the Licensable IP or a
> work in a court of law, then your license ends immediately.
> This is a restriction on use, and thus generally considered to be
> with the OSD. If this was to have any chance at approval at all, the
> termination would need to apply to only the limited usage of the covered
> works which were involved in the fraudulent activity. If the licensee also
> the covered works in other activities, which have not been determined to
> fraudulent, then those licenses would have to stay in force. My opinion of
> course, IANAL, yadda yadda.
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
> those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source
> Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
More information about the License-review