[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 4)

[VanL]

That may be so - but I think it is important that the CAL does not create
any new rights. Thus users should only be able to get what they already
have a right to have.

Thanks,
Van

__________________________
Van Lindberg
van.lindberg at gmail.com
m: 214.364.7985

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 10:23 AM Pamela Chestek <pamela at chesteklegal.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 12/27/2019 9:52 AM, VanL wrote:
> > Specifically, it is in the user data provision. The definition of user
> > data only includes data in which the recipient has an existing right
> > of ownership or possession.
> >
> That assumes there can only be one owner, but I don't believe that's a
> valid assumption with a non-rivalrous good.
>
> Pam
>
>
> Pamela S. Chestek
> Chestek Legal
> PO Box 2492
> Raleigh, NC 27602
> 919-800-8033
> pamela at chesteklegal.com
> www.chesteklegal.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20191227/46588070/attachment.html>