[License-review] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)
Bruce Perens
bruce at perens.com
Thu Aug 29 19:34:37 UTC 2019
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:25 PM Simon Phipps <simon at webmink.com> wrote:
> If you had read to the end of the line you would have seen the explanation.
>>
>> CAL is within the paradigm established by AGPL, even if it is pushing one
>> of the edges
>
>
Well, this is really frustrating, because somehow I just don't have the
mental power to extrapolate, from what you are saying, to how the argument
relates to the terms regarding the user's data at all. So, if you would
actually take the time to set down an argument, rather than giving us
one-liners every few days, we might have some idea of what you mean.
We are all very well aware of your extensively-expressed personal feelings
> about CAL too!
>
Well, in contrast to you, Mr. Executive Director of OSI, I have taken the
trouble to set down my arguments in detail. And I am at least as busy as
you.
Thanks
Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190829/5684c459/attachment.html>
More information about the License-review
mailing list