[License-review] [License-discuss] For approval: The Cryptographic Autonomy License (Beta 2)

[Bruce Perens]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 2:10 AM Henrik Ingo <henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi> wrote:

>
> I was expecting you to also say that "we can't give FSF monopoly to decide
> the boundaries of copyleft" and "OSI was founded to be inclusive also to
> the needs of commercial companies". Surely this omission was just an error?
>

Heck no. I have never been in this to fight FSF. That was the
ill-considered decision of someone who's no longer involved in the process.
OSI and FSF get along these days and we're going to keep it this way.

In your previous email on the topic you mentioned Mulesoft using CPAL.
> MongoDB has never used the CPAL and given that their open source products
> don't even have a GUI it would be an odd license choice.
>

Mea culpa. Please note that correction, it's Mulesoft.

Thanks

Bruce

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20190829/465825b6/attachment.html>