[License-review] Fwd: [Non-DoD Source] Resolution on NOSA 2.0

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Sat Mar 3 04:13:23 UTC 2018


> Which makes it nugatory, but not therefore exceptionable, unless you can
show why it is a problem.

It's nugatory if it's strictly a copyright license. Not if it's a contract.
Licensees in the US would be joining in a contractual agreement regarding
public-domain material, restricting rights they would otherwise have by
default.

    Thanks

    Bruce

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:07 PM, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:
>
> If the language is limited to nations other than the United States, and
>> acknowledges that the work is acknowledged to be in the public domain
>> within the US, it would be acceptable. Right now, it purports to give US
>> citizens a permission we should not need.
>>
>> <http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org>
>
>
> Which makes it nugatory, but not therefore exceptionable, unless you can
> show why it is a problem.
>
> --
> John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
> Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are
> well-known.
> Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites
> Dennett.
> There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However,
> just as
> no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is
> hardly
> known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the
> function
> of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to
> create him.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-
> review_lists.opensource.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180302/085f907d/attachment.html>


More information about the License-review mailing list