[License-review] Fwd: [Non-DoD Source] Resolution on NOSA 2.0

[John Cowan]

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com> wrote:

If the language is limited to nations other than the United States, and
> acknowledges that the work is acknowledged to be in the public domain
> within the US, it would be acceptable. Right now, it purports to give US
> citizens a permission we should not need.
>
> <http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org>


Which makes it nugatory, but not therefore exceptionable, unless you can
show why it is a problem.

-- 
John Cowan          http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
Consider the matter of Analytic Philosophy.  Dennett and Bennett are
well-known.
Dennett rarely or never cites Bennett, so Bennett rarely or never cites
Dennett.
There is also one Dummett.  By their works shall ye know them.  However,
just as
no trinities have fourth persons (Zeppo Marx notwithstanding), Bummett is
hardly
known by his works.  Indeed, Bummett does not exist.  It is part of the
function
of this and other e-mail messages, therefore, to do what they can to create
him.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20180302/3caf8dc4/attachment.html>