[License-review] EUPL v1.2

Simon Phipps simon at webmink.com
Tue May 30 17:38:29 UTC 2017

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz <
pe.schmitz at googlemail.com> wrote:

> - What are the criteria for being categorized as "International Licenses"
> (if LiLIQ belongs to this category, why not the multilingual EUPL ?)

That categorisation was created for licenses submitted in languages other
than English, as it triggers a process that allows the list and board to
reasonably review the license. My understanding was that all the language
variants of EUPL were equivalent so reviewing any language is effectively
the same as reviewing all languages. Is that not the case? If not we might
need to request certified translations of all the variants...


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170530/6a5d27d5/attachment.html>

More information about the License-review mailing list