For Approval: SSCL
Tzeng, Nigel H.
Nigel.Tzeng at jhuapl.edu
Wed Sep 8 14:24:03 UTC 2010
Hit send before I finished my thought.
Perhaps that could be amended to "interoperates with any other OSI approved
license that reciprocates interoperability" to address his concern that if
taken into a GPL project that he cannot use those modifications in his own
project.
A GPL project could include a similar Open Source Exception much like how a
Classpath exception is implemented and be able to use code under this
license. That probably works for MPL as well and would allow all open
source projects to interoperate.
On 9/8/10 10:09 AM, "H Nigel" <Nigel.Tzeng at jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> I like Patrice-Emmanuel's comment regarding interoperability with other OSI
> approved licenses.
>
>
>
> On 9/8/10 9:59 AM, "Russ Nelson" <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
>
>> Gregor, I really REALLY appreciate your enthusiasm, and desire for a
>> succinct copyleft license. But all those words and sentences and
>> paragraphs in the GPL are there for a REASON. I strongly encourage
>> you to read the GPL, and reverse-engineer the wording to see what
>> problem is being solved. Then go and see if the SSCL actually solves
>> that problem unambiguously. Not in your mind, but in the mind of a
>> hostile reader.
>>
>> Legal agreements are made between friends, and interpreted by
>> enemies. You only need a license when the other guy has turned into
>> an asshole.
>>
>> I read through your submission email, and I don't see a description of
>> your objection to the GPL, other than a philosophical objection to its
>> length and complexity and that it doesn't cause compatibility problems
>> (and yet it does, since the GPL requires you to license all derived
>> works under the GPL, so this license is incompatible with the GPL).
>> The GPL is fairly well understood at this point, so that's not a good
>> reason to try to reinvent it.
>>
>> We have a board meeting today. I'll mention the SSCL, and say that
>> it's still under discussion.
>>
>> Gregor Pintar writes:
>>> 2010/7/2, Bruce Perens <bruce at perens.com>:
>>>> Nothing in your text, as presently stated, would reliably prevent
>>>> someone from combining the work with a GPL work and treating the whole
>>>> as if it was under the GPL. Unfortunately, you don't get that _and_
>>>> simplicity both. You'd have to put in more text about combining works,
>>>> the entire work being under this license, no additional restrictions, etc.
>>>>
>>> However, it won't be approved.
>>>
>>>
>>> Fixed licence:
>>>
>>> Copyright (c) years, Company or Person's Name <E-mail address>
>>>
>>> Permission is hereby granted to use, copy, modify and/or distribute
>>> this source code and binary programs derived from this source code
>>> provided that the following conditions are met:
>>>
>>> - Redistributions of this source code must retain this licence text
>>> and all copyright notices without alteration.
>>>
>>> - Redistributions of binary programs which is derived from this source code
>>> must
>>> reproduce this licence text and all copyright notices in the
>>> documentation,
>>> which must be distributed with binary programs.
>>>
>>> - If the binary program is derived from a modified version of this source
>>> code,
>>> you must to publicly release the modified version of this source code
>>> under this license.
>>>
>>> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
>>> WARRANTY. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES
>>> ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
>>>
>>>> From AnastasiyaaqZhdanova at yandex.ru Mon Jul 05 10:10:22 2010
>>> Return-Path: <AnastasiyaaqZhdanova at yandex.ru>
>>> Delivered-To: nelson at desk.crynwr.com
>>> Received: (qmail 4765 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 10:10:17 -0000
>>> Received: from unknown (HELO ns.crynwr.com) (127.0.0.1)
>>> by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 10:10:17 -0000
>>> Received: (qmail 26639 invoked by uid 1003); 5 Jul 2010 08:30:41 -0000
>>> Delivered-To: nelson at crynwr.com
>>> Received: (qmail 26490 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 08:30:08 -0000
>>> Received: from mm-f4.mmnet-ai.ne.jp (HELO 228.224.74.1.122.in-addr.arpa)
>>> (122.1.74.228)
>>> by ns1.crynwr.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 08:30:08 -0000
>>> Received: from aivengo.com.ua (aivengo.com.ua [82.144.63.109]) by
>>> 228.224.74.1.122.in-addr.arpa with ESMTPA id 866820201 for
>>> lego-robotics-subscribe at crynwr.com; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:30:07 +0900
>>> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:30:07 +0900
>>> From: "Наталия Валентиновна"
>>> <AnastasiyaaqZhdanova at yandex.ru>
>>> X-Mailer: axmgzaqe 27
>>> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>>> Message-ID: <5205154693.20100705173007 at yandex.ru>
>>> To: <lego-robotics-subscribe at crynwr.com>
>>> Cc: <nelson-dul-test at crynwr.com>,
>>> <nelson-rss-test at crynwr.com>
>>> In-Reply-To: <BC2A79F5615B8282B31E4AE68E26242D87D29D2D0B60 at crynwr.com>
>>> References: <1BAC4A745EB009B47A76866F70C3AFA79344EC46691A at crynwr.com>
>>> <0C081FB4C47366EE80DE015835149991DF910 at yandex.ru>
>>> Subject: Ефрофлаер 10 000шт.-1000грн. Евробуклет 10 000шт.-2950грн.
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>> boundary="----------E6079EE0F3F7E75"
>>>
>>> ------------E6079EE0F3F7E75
>
More information about the License-review
mailing list