[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

[Jim Wright]

+ 1, this is exactly what some of us had argued and hoped for, thanks and kudos to the code.mil team for hearing it and fingers crossed that this approach is adopted broadly.

 Regards,
  Jim


> On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
> 
> For what little it is worth, having just read intent.md, I think it's an eminently reasonable policy. It gives some baseline certainty for non-.gov contributors, non-US entities, and US entities that are satisfied with a baseline set of FOSS rights. For those who for some reason need the additional flexibility of US-only PD, they can do the research to figure out what is available in that way. 
> 
> Luis
> -- 
> Luis Villa: Open Law and Strategy
> +1-415-938-4552
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170308/974484d7/attachment.html>