<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">+ 1, this is exactly what some of us had argued and hoped for, thanks and kudos to the code.mil team for hearing it and fingers crossed that this approach is adopted broadly.</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"><br></span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> Regards,</span></div><div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);"> Jim</span><br></div><br></div><div><div><br></div>On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Luis Villa <<a href="mailto:luis@lu.is">luis@lu.is</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>For what little it is worth, having just read <a href="http://intent.md">intent.md</a>, I think it's an eminently reasonable policy. It gives some baseline certainty for non-.gov contributors, non-US entities, and US entities that are satisfied with a baseline set of FOSS rights. For those who for some reason need the additional flexibility of US-only PD, they can do the research to figure out what is available in that way. <br><br></div><div>Luis<br></div></div></div><div dir="ltr">-- <br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><i><a href="http://lu.is" target="_blank">Luis Villa: Open Law and Strategy</a><br></i></div><i>+1-415-938-4552</i></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>License-discuss mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:License-discuss@opensource.org">License-discuss@opensource.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss">https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>