[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

[Gervase Markham]

On 08/03/17 20:53, Jim Wright wrote:
> + 1, this is exactly what some of us had argued and hoped for, thanks
> and kudos to the code.mil team for hearing it and fingers crossed that
> this approach is adopted broadly.

Those who support this new direction may want to +1 here:
https://github.com/deptofdefense/code.mil/issues/112

Gerv