[License-discuss] Newbie post: Localisable open source software license
luis at lu.is
Tue Oct 22 18:23:55 UTC 2013
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz <
pe.schmitz at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I believe that you are right when categorizing the EUPL linguistic
> versions as mere translation, even if the design of the license is in fact
> compatible with porting (i.e. stating that the applicable law and the
> competent court are those of the state of the licensor).
It would be interesting (though perhaps off-topic for this list) to have
license authors create a list of the factors that are important to minimize
the need for porting.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss