[License-discuss] Newbie post: Localisable open source software license

[Luis Villa]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz <
pe.schmitz at googlemail.com> wrote:

> I believe that you are right when categorizing the EUPL linguistic
> versions as mere translation, even if the design of the license is in fact
> compatible with porting (i.e. stating that the applicable law and the
> competent court are those of the state of the licensor).


It would be interesting (though perhaps off-topic for this list) to have
license authors create a list of the factors that are important to minimize
the need for porting.

Luis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20131022/faa89c76/attachment.html>