[License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)

Ken Arromdee arromdee at rahul.net
Wed Jan 2 18:54:50 UTC 2013

On Tue, 1 Jan 2013, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
>> Some people use ordinary GPL on libraries with the intent of crippling
>> competing commercial reuse (since any competitors have to release
>> their source and competitors wouldn't want to do that).
> Really? That's not wise.
> How would the choice of license affect the *legal* determination of whether
> the resulting work is or is not a derivative work for which source code must
> be disclosed?

The choice of license affects whether source code must be disclosed at all.
If the library was under the LGPL, the competitor would not have to provide

More information about the License-discuss mailing list