[License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)
bruce at perens.com
Wed Jan 2 02:58:19 UTC 2013
Would that we all had infinite budgets for going to court :-) But short
of having them, many businesses choose, quite sensibly, to err on the
conservative side of this sort of issue and will honor the license
whether or not a court would make them do so. This will also get them
through an M&A intellectual property audit in better shape than otherwise.
I do know a company that spent money, including on me, to argue just
this sort of issue recently. They spent more than most businesses would
be able to endure.
On 01/01/2013 05:23 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> Really? That's not wise. How would the choice of license affect the
> *legal* determination of whether the resulting work is or is not a
> derivative work for which source code must be disclosed?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss