[License-discuss] Draft of new OSI licenses landing page; please review.

[Johnny Solbu]

On Wednesday 04 April 2012 20:40, Karl Fogel wrote:
>    "The FooBar license is not FSF-approved, so maybe it should be listed
>    father down, since all other things being equal we don't want to push
>    a non-FSF-approved license over approved ones".

Maybe there should be some kind if indication of FSF aproved licenses? 

I can think of two ways to do that: Listing them in a separate group, 
or some sort of icon or text next to the licenses.

-- 
Johnny A. Solbu
web site,   http://www.solbu.net
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
********************************
Kom Arbeidslyst og treng deg på,
her skal du motstand finne.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120404/f6a01f13/attachment.sig>