Terekhov [was Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.]

[Karl Fogel]

Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org> writes:
>Terekhov has been banned from this list[1] and warned on
>license-review [2]. [Disclosure: I've also banned him from the MPL
>mailing list, and he has attacked me personally repeatedly, so take
>with a grain of salt.]
>
>I'm guessing that he's now allowed to post again because he appears to
>have changed his email address, but it seems clear to me from his most
>recent posts that his attitude and behavior have not changed  His lack
>of civility and constructive contribution are highly damaging to
>creating a functional, healthy culture on this list, and I would
>recommend banning his new email address as well as the old.

*nod*  Thanks for the background, Luis.

I'll privately correspond with Alexandre now, and for the moment would
like to take this topic off-list if we could.

-Karl

>[1] http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi/3/15712
>[2] http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?17:msp:1222:banhcmepbbncmpccmnhd
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:04:31PM +0100, Alexandre Terekhov wrote:
>>>
>>> Non-proprietary is known as public domain.
>>>
>>> As long as OSI-listed documents do NOT disclaim copyright ownership,
>>> they are all proprietary licenses. The OSI-blessed choice of
>>> consideration in exchange to license grant does not make the licensees
>>> less proprietary.
>>
>> You are aware you are using terms in ways that conflict with the way most
>> people understand them -- right?
>>
>> --
>> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
>>