Terekhov

[Alexandre Terekhov]

Is this a personal attack fallacy?

To repeat: 

MPL RC1 drafter(s) should better go back to law school.

----- Ursprüngliche Message -----
Von: Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org>
An: "license-discuss at opensource.org" <license-discuss at opensource.org>
Cc: 
Gesendet: 18:29 Dienstag, 16.August 2011 
Betreff: Terekhov [was Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.]

Terekhov has been banned from this list[1] and warned on
license-review [2]. [Disclosure: I've also banned him from the MPL
mailing list, and he has attacked me personally repeatedly, so take
with a grain of salt.]

I'm guessing that he's now allowed to post again because he appears to
have changed his email address, but it seems clear to me from his most
recent posts that his attitude and behavior have not changed  His lack
of civility and constructive contribution are highly damaging to
creating a functional, healthy culture on this list, and I would
recommend banning his new email address as well as the old.

Luis

[1] http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi/3/15712
[2] http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?17:msp:1222:banhcmepbbncmpccmnhd


On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Chad Perrin <perrin at apotheon.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:04:31PM +0100, Alexandre Terekhov wrote:
>>
>> Non-proprietary is known as public domain.
>>
>> As long as OSI-listed documents do NOT disclaim copyright ownership,
>> they are all proprietary licenses. The OSI-blessed choice of
>> consideration in exchange to license grant does not make the licensees
>> less proprietary.
>
> You are aware you are using terms in ways that conflict with the way most
> people understand them -- right?
>
> --
> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
>