a plea
Chris DiBona
cdibona at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 15:50:37 UTC 2007
It's funny that those who most want to regulate the list seem to be
happy to rant about the list being too ranty...
Just saying.
Chris
On 9/10/07, Michael Poole <mdpoole at troilus.org> wrote:
> Brian Behlendorf writes:
>
> > Count me in with Luis's lot, concerned that the sheer volume of
> > messages on this list threatens to prevent the involvement of more
> > than a small group. Therefore, I plea that we discontinue the
> > conversations about tort law, the mechanics or ethics of sublicensing,
> > or other fairly off-topic conversations.
>
> Topic drift is inevitable in this kind of analysis. Tort law, the
> mechanics of sublicensing, and other topics come up precisely because
> someone thinks they are relevant to whether a license meets the OSD.
> The discussion most often continues because there is a disagreement
> about the implications. One cannot entirely sever that from the
> question of whether the license should be certified.
>
> At a certain point, the discussion stops being relevant, but that is
> an argument that should be made on a case-by-case basis. It should
> not be made by a general dictum about what is acceptably on topic.
>
> Michael Poole
>
--
Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source program can be found at http://code.google.com
Personal Weblog: http://dibona.com
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list