a plea

[Chris Travers]

On 9/10/07, Michael Poole <mdpoole at troilus.org> wrote:
>
>
> At a certain point, the discussion stops being relevant, but that is
> an argument that should be made on a case-by-case basis.  It should
> not be made by a general dictum about what is acceptably on topic.


+1

Additionally things need to be designated in such a way as to be
even-handed.  For example, I felt like at one point Rick Moen asked me for
more information on-list, so I posted it, and he argued that it was
off-topic.  This sort of thing undermines any semblance of topic
boundaries.  Having this sort of decision which really should be made by the
OSI or specifically appointed representative because this way the structure
is not undermined by a few individuals.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers


Michael Poole
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070913/59d21e0b/attachment.html>