conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Fri Aug 3 17:55:15 UTC 2007

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> BTW, ask also who is Williams and what is his (Williams) legal theory.
> "This does not assist Williams, however, because his legal theory is
> faulty substantively."

Unfortunately for you and Williams/Wallace, neither of these errors are 
relevant to the core holding, which is that Wallace (repeatedly) failed 
to show an antitrust violation.

Matt Flaschen

More information about the License-discuss mailing list