conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

Alexander Terekhov alexander.terekhov at
Fri Aug 3 17:44:45 UTC 2007

On 8/3/07, Matthew Flaschen <matthew.flaschen at> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>  > neither the original author, nor any
> > creator of a revised or improved version, may charge for the software
> > or allow any successor to charge.
> I can't see how the GPL could remotely be interpreted as prohibiting the
> original author from charging for work they hold copyright on.


and drop him an email.

BTW, ask also who is Williams and what is his (Williams) legal theory.

"This does not assist Williams, however, because his legal theory is
faulty substantively."


More information about the License-discuss mailing list