conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Thu Aug 2 21:08:32 UTC 2007
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Could it be possible that FSF does *not* wish court scrutiny of the
> "pure"*** GPL under copyright and contract law?
Which forms of licence that meet the OSD do you consider to be legally
If there are any, is there any remaining scope for new licences in those
If the answer to either the first or second question is "none", why are
you on a list that is specifically there for the purpose of accrediting
new licences as complying with the OSD?
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss