conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Fri Aug 3 17:30:02 UTC 2007

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

 > neither the original author, nor any
> creator of a revised or improved version, may charge for the software
> or allow any successor to charge.

I can't see how the GPL could remotely be interpreted as prohibiting the 
original author from charging for work they hold copyright on.

Matt Flaschen

More information about the License-discuss mailing list