conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Fri Aug 3 17:30:02 UTC 2007
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> neither the original author, nor any
> creator of a revised or improved version, may charge for the software
> or allow any successor to charge.
I can't see how the GPL could remotely be interpreted as prohibiting the
original author from charging for work they hold copyright on.
More information about the License-discuss