Best licence for my software?
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Mon Apr 18 04:58:01 UTC 2005
David Dillard scripsit:
> Ah, but the open source dual license model is where the licensee, not
> the licensor, determines that the licensee would like to use a non-open
> source license (assuming one is available).
Not so. Suppose I issue a program under the GPL but also offer
a proprietary license for $100. Nothing says that I *have* to license
everyone who is willing to pay $100; the latter is a contract and requires
the consent of *both* parties.
> The OSD is quit specific: No discrimination against persons or groups is
That's interpreted to mean that everyone must get at least an open source
license. Nothing says that some people can't get more favorable terms
by reason of either status (i.e. being my cousin Fred, or a university
student) or contract.
IANAL, TINLA, IANTOSI.
Why are well-meaning Westerners so concerned that John Cowan
the opening of a Colonel Sanders in Beijing means jcowan at reutershealth.com
the end of Chinese culture? [...] We have had http://www.reutershealth.com
Chinese restaurants in America for over a century, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and it hasn't made us Chinese. On the contrary,
we obliged the Chinese to invent chop suey. --Marshall Sahlins
More information about the License-discuss