Microsoft's near-OSD-compliant shared source license
david at usermode.org
Tue Jul 1 04:19:08 UTC 2003
On Monday 30 June 2003 09:01 pm, Don Jarrell wrote:
> So, it only says that I cannot, in effect, do something
> that _uses_another_license_ to REQUIRE of subsequent
> distros, what this license accomplishes explicitly in
> its own language. How parochial is that ?!?
It seems to me to be just as parochial as the GPL and most other strong
copyleft licenses. At least that's how I read that clause.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss