Fwd: Apple GCC source code license (APSL)

[James Michael DuPont]

David,
thanks for you comments and help.

Not understanding too much about lawyer, I get easily confused by these
issues.

Thanks again,
mike

--- David Johnson <david at usermode.org> wrote:
> On Monday 27 January 2003 11:33 pm, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> 
> > The cvs does require accepting the license hence my question.
> 
> I think that's because the repository has code under multiple
> licenses, one of 
> which is the APSL. They aren't claiming that everything in that
> repository is 
> under the APSL, only that you need to join an "APSL Club" to see it.
> If you 
> don't join that club, you can get the same GPL code elsewhere on the
> same 
> site. Besides which, implementing a click-through on just parts of a 
> repository would be a royal pain in the arse.
> 
> > so there is no problem in republishing the sources directly under
> the
> > gpl?
> 
> If the license says GPL then follow the GPL to your hearts content.
> Publish 
> away.
> 
> -- 
> David Johnson
> ___________________
> http://www.usermode.org
> pgp public key on website


=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3