Nees help selecting a license
jacobus.vosloo at daimlerchrysler.com
jacobus.vosloo at daimlerchrysler.com
Thu Apr 10 09:00:39 UTC 2003
Miko said:
> The original question was if in order to "clear" copyright developers
> should either (1) rewrite the code submissions or (2) get (written)
> copyright assignments.
Option three (3) is to make an amendment to the license.
I know it's been through many discussions on this newsgroup. The reason I want
to raise it again is because of its importance to the business community.
Almost every business that considers releasing source code will eventually come
to the question:
"How do we LEGALLY keep two parallel projects running, while one is open
source."
Possible solutions for (3):
a) In your license, require of the contributor to grant you the license to use
the changes in your parallel proprietary project.
This is what business would like, the justification is: "We released the
source code in good faith, the contributors can give us their ideas, in good
faith"
b) Give everyone the right to sell the software, like the Lucent Public License
at
(http://plan9.bell-labs.com/hidden/template.html)
Disadvantages:
1) Even if you do rewrite the code submission, and the idea is the same, with
very small differences,
some countries would still take it as a copy of at least the idea.
2) As was pointed out earlier, copyright assignment can only work if the
assigner verifiably owns the copyright,
and both you and the assigner reside in a country that accepts copyright
assignment.
In my opinion this method, could cause many companies to unknowingly make
themselves liable for litigation.
3) These two extremes, each has it's own problems, as stated below.
a. It can be used to misuse the contributors. Viral?
b. This will not create a big following by businesses that need to survive
from their software sales.
Even though selling support can work, as Redhat is proving, it is still
a very niche marketing methodology.
Conclusion:
Option 3 is the only legally sound solution I know of, but a middle ground must
be found that can be supported by both the community and Business.
I am quite sure we as a community will eventually find a solution. The
timeframe simply depends on our flexibility.
Thanks to the OSI for working to achieve this?
Note: I am not a lawyer. I am a business developer, I need a solution to this
problem.
Good wishes to all
Jacobus Vosloo
Application Integrator for .Net
Invision DaimlerChrysler - East London
Email: jacobus.vosloo at daimlerchrysler.com
Tel: +27 43 706 2477
Fax: +27 43 706 2612
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where stated otherwise.
Emails can contain viruses; make sure your system is protected before opening
any attached files.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list