an open source model code: osd 2002

[Rod Dixon]

Good point! Thank you.

Rod


On Thu, 23 May 2002, phil hunt wrote:

> On Thursday 23 May 2002  4:03 am, Rod Dixon wrote:
> > Please take a moment or two to download a draft of the framework for our
> > work on the OSD. We have only posted Article 1. We would like to hear
> > your thoughts on the framework. It is our view that a model code is the
> > most helpful framework for augmenting the Open Source Definition (OSD),
> > but we would like to hear what the folks on license-discuss have to say.
>
>
>    1-1 The license shall not
>    restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of
>    an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different
>    sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale
>
> This could be changed to:
>
>    1-1 The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the
>    software, EITHER ON ITS OWN, OR as a component of an aggregate software
>    distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license
>    shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale
>
>
>
>
> --
> <"><"><"> Philip Hunt <philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk> <"><"><">
> "I would guess that he really believes whatever is politically
> advantageous for him to believe."
>                         -- Alison Brooks, referring to Michael
>                               Portillo, on soc.history.what-if
> --
> license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
>

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3