Section 2 source distribution terms (was Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad))

[Russell Nelson]

Thorsten Glaser writes:
 > This breaks things which do not only consider code being licensed
 > under $any_license but any kind of "work" (be it code, documentation,
 > books etc.)

OSI certifies software, not documentation, as open source.  There are
various documentation licenses out there.  We're not decided on
whether we want to certify documentation.

-- 
-russ nelson <sig at russnelson.com>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war.  For my take, see:
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | http://quaker.org/crime.html
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3