QPL issue

[Joachim Bauernberger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 November 2001 15:14, you wrote:
> > I have been working on a software project which I intend to license under 
the
> > QPL. I have decided to choose this type of license because I thought I 
could
> > share my source with anybody interested in seeing it and also charge
> > non-commercial users such as ISP's, etc... with a fee to recover some of 
my
> > costs. Anybody else could use my program at no charge.
> 
> This is the QPL.  What about QPL clause 6b?
> 
> You can charge anyone whatever you want to give them a copy.  You are
> welcome to change ISPs something additional.  But once they have a
> copy, they have the freedom to distribute as many copies as they 
> want, and you get paid nothing for that.
> 
> 

Thanks for pointing this out to me. I thought that I have understood all 
points of the license (but obviously I haven't).

I think I have mixed 2 things up:
The QPL and the Qt Non Commercial license. 

However I think that the latter is not OSI approved. Is there any other 
similar license to that which would be OSI approved??
> 

- -- 
You can get my public pgp key here:
http://foobar.gmxhome.de/pgp/joachim.html
PGP fingerprint:
25 96 E0 25 48 D9 8E 10  3C C0 48 E7 AF 5A E2 C6  A3 15 05 E6


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBO/kah69a4sajFQXmEQKO3gCfeuf+UPZLvzm1MFMztq+qwpf+VkMAoJpt
ddqmHj3Ajaxd3jGKqlps3rgq
=UYut
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3