OSD #1 proposed change
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Wed Nov 14 22:11:41 UTC 2001
on Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 12:58:54AM -0500, Forrest J. Cavalier III (mibsoft at mibsoftware.com) wrote:
> bruce at perens.com wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > It still makes a _wonderful_ manifesto, its success speaks for that. But to
> > apply it blindly would be foolhardy. I imagine that there is an unbounded set
> > of licenses that appear to be OSD-compliant yet are so pernicious in their
> > terms as to be outside of the spirit of the OSD.
>
> If I've read recent messages correctly, the current feeling of the
> board is shifting towards being able to reject licenses submitted
> for approval only based on the letter of the OSD, not the spirit as
> was the original intent.
>
> If that is so, I propose rewording OSD #1, consistent with Bruce's
> reply.
>
> Currently OSD #1 reads:
> The license shall not restrict any party from selling
> or giving away the software as a component of an
> aggregate software distribution containing programs
> from several different sources. The license shall
> not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.
>
> I propose it be changed to:
> The license shall not restrict any party from selling
> or giving away copies of the software, either separately
> or as a component of an aggregate software distribution
> containing programs from several different sources. The
> license shall not require a royalty or other fee to make
> or use such copies.
I'm opposed to such a change until it's demonstrated that the existing
definition doesn't already achieve this effect. I've posted my
rationale for suggesting it does.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20011114/ccf4a93a/attachment.sig>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list