Open source shareware?
phil hunt
philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk
Thu Nov 8 17:08:51 UTC 2001
On Thursday 08 November 2001 4:05 pm, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
> Can someone point out the OSD violation of a shareware
> license such as the following? I realize it violates
> the spirit of the OSD, but I cannot find where it violates
> the "letter" of the OSD. The OSD is silent on "use" and
> I think this illustrates the problem.
I think you are right.
> Russ Nelson has indicated that the specific wording of the OSD
> is important. Can we find a way that the OSD rejects this kind
> of license?
AFAICT, this license is OSD-compliant. Obviously this was not the
intent of the writers of the OSD, which means we need to consider
amending it.
The license in question:
> As long as this permission notice and disclaimer are included, any
> person obtaining a copy of this software may distribute this
> software or derivatives.
>
> If you decide to run the software after a 30 day evaluation period,
> you must pay a fee of $20 to <copyright holder.>
--
*** Philip Hunt *** philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk ***
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list