[CAVO] Fwd: Re: [License-review] [Was: Submission of OSET Public License for Approval] -- National Security and Public Policy (3.5B and 4)

[Lawrence Rosen]

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab®|PRO

-------- Original message --------
From: Josh Berkus <josh at postgresql.org> 
Date:09/17/2015  8:42 AM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: license-review at opensource.org 
Subject: Re: [License-review] [Was: Submission of OSET Public License for
  Approval] -- National Security and Public Policy (3.5B and 4) 

On 09/16/2015 08:11 PM, Meeker, Heather J. wrote:
> Understood, and by implication I gather you would also not contribute to any project under a permissive license.
> 

Nope, because I already do (which you'd realize if you googled me).  The
issue is one of asymmetry.

If I contribute to OSET under the OSET license, and I have to obey the
terms of the OSET license if I want to use the OSET software in my own
business.  But governments, and favored contractors with complaint
legislators, or even just corrupt beaurocrats, get to use my
contribution *without* the restrictions which I must obey.  So the OSET
license creates a 2-class system, in which people with access to the
levers of government have more rights than code contributors do.

Personally I think corrupt legislators and beaurocrats have enough power
already.  We don't need to give them more in the terms of a license.

This is materially identical to dual-licensing, where companies offer
code under the GPL, but also commercially license it.  I don't
contribute to those projects either (and neither does anyone else,
historically).  Imagine if someone asked us to certify a license which
said "corporations can ignore any provision of this license which
conflicts with company policy".  This would not be an OSS license.

Due to this provision, I see the OSET license as presented as being in
violation of the OSD, and would not currently vote to certify it.

--Josh Berkus



_______________________________________________
License-review mailing list
License-review at opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/cavo_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150917/cadb8b08/attachment.html>