[License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0

[Eric Schultz]

Thanks for submitting this license.

I think the tenets should be included in a preamble instead of as "conditions": calling them conditions makes the license confusing and vague. Additionally, the license should be modified to make clear that the preamble is non-operative.

Some people on this list have expressed that some non-operative preambles could preclude a license from being OSD compliant. I don't think I agree with that conclusion but you should be aware of that.

Eric



On September 4, 2024 11:45:50 AM CDT, "Ω Alisson" <thelinuxlich at gmail.com> wrote:
>In accordance with the License Review Process
><http://opensource.org/approval>, I'd like to submit for review the
>Adversary Public License 1.0 (ADVPL), which is composed of the MIT license
>text + 7 tenets from the Temple of Satan. It complies with all terms of
>the Open Source Definition, the suggested tag is ADVPL. Currently no
>significant projects use it, although there is intent once it's approved.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20240905/2a3bad28/attachment-0001.htm>