[License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0
Carlo Piana
carlo at piana.eu
Thu Sep 5 15:57:12 UTC 2024
Dear Alisson,
you purport to have added "conditions", but in fact you have added general aspirational staments which technically do not consist of conditions. Therefore, the grant is conditioned to conditions which are not conditions and that have nothing to do with the interaction with software. At best, it is matter that would belong in a preamble. Please consider this as a technical remark, not as a remark on the principles (with which I seem to agree, but it's immaterial).
In addition, I think this submission does not fully comply with the submission guidelines. I doubt a lawyer has laid their eyes on this text and I can't find any such indication.
The conclusion IMHO should be "rejection".
With best regards,
Carlo (in his own personal capacity)
> Da: "Ω Alisson" <thelinuxlich at gmail.com>
> A: "license-review at lists.opensource.org" <license-review at lists.opensource.org>
> Inviato: Mercoledì, 4 settembre 2024 18:45:50
> Oggetto: [License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0
> In accordance with the [ http://opensource.org/approval | License Review Process
> ] , I'd like to submit for review the Adversary Public License 1.0 (ADVPL),
> which is composed of the MIT license text + 7 tenets from the Temple of Satan.
> It complies with all terms of the Open Source Definition, the suggested tag is
> ADVPL. Currently no significant projects use it, although there is intent once
> it's approved.
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily
> those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source
> Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20240905/5e77097f/attachment.htm>
More information about the License-review
mailing list