<html><body><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">Dear Alisson,<br><br>you purport to have added "conditions", but in fact you have added general aspirational staments which technically do not consist of conditions. Therefore, the grant is conditioned to conditions which are not conditions and that have nothing to do with the interaction with software. At best, it is matter that would belong in a preamble. Please consider this as a technical remark, not as a remark on the principles (with which I seem to agree, but it's immaterial).<br><br>In addition, I think this submission does not fully comply with the submission guidelines. I doubt a lawyer has laid their eyes on this text and I can't find any such indication.<br><br>The conclusion IMHO should be "rejection".<br><br>With best regards,<br><br>Carlo (in his own personal capacity)<br><br><hr id="zwchr" data-marker=""><div data-marker=""><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>Da: </b>"Ω Alisson" <thelinuxlich@gmail.com><br><b>A: </b>"license-review@lists.opensource.org" <license-review@lists.opensource.org><br><b>Inviato: </b>Mercoledì, 4 settembre 2024 18:45:50<br><b>Oggetto: </b>[License-review] New License for review: ADVPL 1.0<br></blockquote></div><div data-marker=""><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><div dir="ltr"><div>In accordance with the <a href="http://opensource.org/approval" target="_blank">License Review Process</a>, I'd like to submit for review the Adversary Public License 1.0 (ADVPL), which is composed of the MIT license text + 7 tenets from the Temple of Satan. It complies with all terms of the Open Source Definition, the suggested tag is ADVPL. Currently no significant projects use it, although there is intent once it's approved.<br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Communication from the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.<br><br>License-review mailing list<br>License-review@lists.opensource.org<br>http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org<br></blockquote></div></div></body></html>