[License-review] Resubmission of the European Space Agency Public Licenses (ESA-PL) for approval

[Filli Liberandum]

Please see
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003342.html

http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003343.html
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003344.html
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003349.html


On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:41 PM Pamela Chestek <
pamela.chestek at opensource.org> wrote:

> It was brought to my attention that the ESA Public Licenses, as submitted
> here:
> http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2018-March/003337.html,
> were never acted upon by the OSI. I extend the OSI's apologies for the
> lapse.
>
> I have reviewed the threads and have a few questions about the licenses.
> There are separate threads for the three licenses and I'll raise my
> questions there.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pamela Chestek
> Open Source Initiative
> Chair, Licensing Committee
>
>
>
> On 3/12/18 9:56 PM, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> I've reviewed the ESA licenses about 10 days ago. Patrice also had a
> question. You haven't engaged either of us. It seems to me that most of the
> issues I saw worked to ESA's disadvantage rather than everyone else's. For
> example, 7.1 and 7.2 essentially negate themseves except for the rare case
> that there is already a court ruling determining infringement, and ESA says
> "You should acquire the respective rights or modify the Software so that
> the Modification is non-infringing" which in my country really only should
> come from one's own lawyer.
>
> Do you wish to respond to any of the comments, or should we make
> recommendations on the basis of the license text as it stands?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Bruce Perens
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing listLicense-review at lists.opensource.orghttp://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at lists.opensource.org
>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20191029/64a2b996/attachment.html>